10 Ways that Model G20 Is Different from Model UN

One of the questions we’re asked most often at Knovva Academy is how our Model G20 Summits compare to Model UN. The two programs sound similar in name and concept, and teachers, parents, and students all wonder what makes them unique.

Our new white paper, “Model G20 vs. Model UN: What’s the Difference? ” answers this question in depth. It is definitely worth a read if you’re considering one or both events. Here, we’ll provide the Cliff Notes version for a quick and easy overview of each program’s similarities and differences.

Before we dive in, it’s important to note that the “Model G20 vs. Model UN” debate is by no means an either-or decision. Both organizations deliver tremendous value and both can be transformative experiences for young people. Many Model G20 alums have also participated in Model UN and have shared that both programs were 100% worthwhile, independently and in relation to each other. For politically-minded high schoolers, the answer to the “which one” question might well be “both”.

So, what does make Model G20 different from Model UN? Let’s compare the programs in ten ways to find out.

10 ways Model G20 is different from Model UN

1. Objective & perspective

One of the core differentiators between Model UN and Model G20 is the program perspective. Model UN emulates the actual UN, an institution that has been in place with few changes since 1946. It approaches international relations in a traditional way that’s grounded in that history, including more formal processes and outcomes. Model G20, similarly, takes after its “parent” organization. It utilizes a less formal approach and emphasizes skills like creativity, critical thinking, and collaboration. We call these “21^st century skills” and believe that they are critical to young people’s success.

2. Program length

Model UNs typically take place in one or two days, often over a weekend. This makes them easier to schedule and to fit in amongst busy high school schedules. Model G20 Summits are significantly longer, running from 9-12 days. While this requires a bigger time commitment, it also allows for a much deeper experience academically and socially.

3. Geographic scope

Model UN events occur locally, with participants coming from the same school, district, or region. Again, this affords the program a lower barrier to entry and allows students to form or strengthen relationships with their immediate peer communities. Model G20 Summits, on the other hand, are very deliberately global events. Attendees come from all over the world and network with each other before, during, and after the events to build a long-lasting international community.

4. Exclusivity

One of the wonderful things about Model UN is that anyone can join. Participation is only limited by the number of available positions. Model G20, on the other hand, requires a rather rigorous application process and generally selects students who demonstrate academic prowess and leadership potential.

5. Pre-event prep 

Before each Model G20 Summit, attendees take a six-week online course, Living in a Connected World, in preparation for the event. In addition, they work with their fellow participants from around the world in interactive projects and online forums. Pre-event work for Model UN is much more varied, as it depends on each individual program. Some do not require any prep, while some provide study guides to review or ask students to prepare a position paper prior to the conference.

6. In-program leadership

Model G20 Summits are created and led by teams of seasoned educators from top universities. Instructors at the event range from college professors to business leaders to successful entrepreneurs. Model UN programs, in contrast, are typically helmed by undergraduate students without a clear protocol from the head organization.

7. Expert access

A highlight of Model G20 is its guests. From keynote speeches to meet-and-greets, Model G20 provides a number of opportunities for students to learn from and network with some of today’s brightest minds. Past speakers include world leaders, diplomats, reporters, professors, entrepreneurs and innovators. Because Model UN programs are often tight on time and budget, these “big names” are more difficult to attract.

8. Areas of emphasis

Model UN stays close to its roots, focusing on resolutions, motions, and speeches. The atmosphere is more formal and more competitive. Model G20, conversely, emphasizes collaboration, negotiation, and the power of communication and relationships. While students learn the formal processes, they also gain experience in real-world diplomacy: the conversations held over meals, in small groups, and in hallways.

9. Non-academic enrichment

Because Model UN events are brief, the program is almost exclusively academic. Model G20’s longer format allows for 2-3 days of exploration and relationship-building at the beginning and end of each program. Summits are held in the world’s most exciting cities, and students have the chance to explore the famous sights as well as enjoy exclusive cultural experiences.

10. Post-event follow-up 

When students leave Model UN, it’s up to them to maintain their knowledge and friendships. Model G20, however, places just as much importance on post-event connection as pre-event preparation. Students become part of Knovva’s dynamic alumni network, staying in touch with old friends and meeting new ones via our online community. Alums can also start or join Model G20 clubs at their own schools, bringing the experience home, or organize or attend local alumni events.

Model G20 and Model UN both offer motivated high school students an extraordinary opportunity to learn, grow, and lead. We’re excited to be inspiring today’s youth alongside Model UN and proud to offer a new option for the leaders of tomorrow.

For a more detailed comparison of Model G20 and Model UN, read the white paper: Model G20 vs. Model UN: What’s the Difference?